Dutch Court Bans The Sale Of Samsung Galaxy Smartphones In Europe

Samsung Versus Apple

A Dutch court has found Samsung guilty of infringing an Apple patent relating to photo management, and ordered a Europe wide ban on the sale of Samsung Galaxy smartphones from October 13th. The Galaxy Tab, Samsung’s iPad rival, has not been named in the injunction and its sales would remain unaffected in this region.

The patent in question, titled “Portable Electronic Device for Photo Management”, illustrates the concept of swiping through a gallery of images on a touchscreen device. Samsung’s Galaxy smartphones, which run on Android 2.3, incorporate this concept of swiping through images. The Galaxy Tab on the other hand runs on Android 3.0 (Honeycomb), which uses a different way of navigating through images, letting it off the hook.

Apple's Swiping Based Photo Patent

The injunction is applicable in all EU countries where this patent is valid. Surprisingly a number of European countries like Austria, Italy and Romania do not figure in this list since Apple failed to complete the necessary procedures required to file a patent in these regions. However, a ban in Netherlands effectively cripples Samsung’s entire European distribution channel since all of Samsung’s imports go through this area.

The ban kicks in after 7 weeks, which means Samsung would very soon issue a patch for the image viewing software on its smartphones ensuring that it does not violate the patent in question. If the update is delivered within this period of seven weeks, Samsung could escape the ban entirely and there would be no disruption in the sale of its smartphones at all.

Apple had sued Samsung claiming a violation of ten of its patents out of which nine were rejected. So this isn’t exactly the victory Apple would have wanted, but nevertheless it does indicate that other Android phones have very high chances of infringing the photo management patent. In a response to the ruling Samsung issued a statement which read:

“Today’s ruling is an affirmation that the Galaxy range of products is innovative and distinctive. With regard to the single infringement cited in the ruling, we will take all possible measures including legal action to ensure that there is no disruption in the availability of our Galaxy smartphones to Dutch consumers”

As the statement indicates, the legal tussle between Apple and Samsung is nowhere near an end. Samsung has adopted an interesting strategy to defend itself against an iPad design patent in the US. Samsung cites Stanley Kubrick’s ’2001: A Space Odyssey’ movie as prior art against iPad design patent.

Apple had earlier obtained a similar injunction against the Galaxy Tab, which was later suspended over doubts on whether a German court had the right to order a Korean based company to stop selling its products.

[BBC via FOSS Patents]

Like this post? Share it!

  • Mel

    First there is their control freakery, which means I had to jailbreak my iPhone to make it usable. Now Apple’s corporate behaviour is really starting to suck big-time.
    I won’t be buying another iPhone.

  • iphoneuser

    Totally agree with you Mel. Competition is supposed to be healthy for everyone.
    Most iphone users must agree that the iphone only really comes into its when jailbroken. What happens when a new firmware is jailbroken – Apple patch it with new firmware.
    They cant handle competition and they are not supportive to their userbase.
    All Apple want is money and world domination.
    Thank God Apple did not invent the wheel……….

  • fingers21

    While competition is healthy, copying ideas will never push the industry forward! The iPhone was revolutionary, to advance forward, companies need to better it, not copy it. The same with all products, not just apple! The wheel advanced by adding rubber to it, so on so forth!

  • John jay

    Apple are greedy bastards to hell with them!

  • http://www.motorbeam.com/ fas

    If you copy then you gotta face the consequences!