Google’s Motorola Files Another Patent Suit Against Apple

motorola-logoBloomberg reports that Google owned Motorola Mobility has filed a new patent infringement lawsuit against Apple with the International Trade Commission (ITC), asking for a ban on the import of iPhones, iPads, iPod touch and Macs in the US.

This is Motorola’s second lawsuit against Apple with the ITC. A preliminary ruling in the previous Apple versus Motorola trial held Apple guilty of infringing one of Motorola’s patent. The final ruling for the case is due to be announced by August 24th.

From Bloomberg’s report:

Google Inc.’s Motorola Mobility unit said it filed a new patent-infringement case against Apple Inc. claiming that features on some Apple devices, including the Siri voice-recognition program, infringe its patents.

The complaint at the U.S. International Trade Commission claims infringement of seven Motorola Mobility patents on features including location reminders, e-mail notification and phone/video players, Motorola Mobility said yesterday. The case seeks a ban on U.S. imports of devices including the iPhone, iPad and Mac computers.

Motorola’s statement on the lawsuit, as given to Bloomberg:

“We would like to settle these patent matters, but Apple’s unwillingness to work out a license leaves us little choice but to defend ourselves and our engineers’ innovations.”

The seven patents are all non standards essential, which means that Motorola is under no obligation to license them to any company.

Florian Mueller speculates on the reasons Motorola filed a second suit:

The announcement of this new complaint may be driven in part by a desire to demonstrate that Motorola isn’t finished even if its first ITC complaint against Apple may fail (in its entirety, or for the most part). Another possible motivation on Google’s part is that the acquisition of Motorola Mobility has not been money well spent so far. And a third reason could be that Apple has the upper hand in its dispute with Samsung and may receive a favorable verdict, possibly as early as next week, which would call into question Google’s ability to bring about the patent peace it promised a year ago when it announced the Motorola deal.

Android manufacturers would be glad to see Google using its intellectual property to stand up against Apple, hoping that this could lead to some sort of a cross licensing agreement between the two companies. Whether Motorola’s claims of patent infringement actually hold up in court is something that we’ll only know when the trial starts, which typically takes months, if not years.

Recent Posts


  • Que

    Oh. How the tables have turned. Apple pick a fight with Samsung and their friend Google got their back. Karma is a B.

  • defmad

    Quite frankly, I’m sick of this sh*t. How about all these companies spend more time and money on creating products people want? I can understand companies wanting to protect thier IP, but it’s quite obvious that some companies just want a piece of Apple pie. And the crap with Apple vs. Samsung, of course competing companies copy from each other, but Samsung rode on the iPhones popularity too much; Apple spent a lot of time and money developing their products. Samsung are just scared Apple will dominate the TV market with the Apple TV. As a retailer who has sold Samsung TV’s, fridges and washing machines, I always recommend products other than Samsung which are more reliable; I have less problems with defects and repair issues. Plus I find Samsungs products have a cheap plastic feel.
    /end rant

    • iDude

      Apple started this entire patent mess that is going on now by suing anyone and anything. If it comes back to them it will not be unwarranted. You are right that this needs to stop and everyone needs to spend money on innovation, but that is not going to happen if Apple wont stop filing claims. On another note, Apple TV in my opinion will never take over. Samsung is too established, and produces the current best sets on the market. With the progress and openness of Android, Apple’s closed ecosystem will not be as easily adopted for a TV. I don’t mind risking my iPhone with jailbreaking and tweaking so that I can remove Apple’s restraints, but I’ll be damned if i’m gonna try to jailbreak a $2500 TV just so it does what I want.

      • dankvwguy

        ^hit the nail on the head.

      • Nabil Jaser

        And that’s IF Apple sells a TV for “only” $2500. I guarantee you if Apple comes out with a TV it’ll cost 3 times the price of an equivalent TV. Not to mention it won’t be Apple that actually makes said TV Lmao. Imagine the irony if it turns out Samsung is making Apple TVs lol.