Apple Posts Updated ‘Samsung Didn’t Copy iPad’ Statement On Its UK Website; Acknowledges Previous One Was “Inaccurate”

As expected, Apple has now posted the statement acknowledgement the judgement on its UK website, which  complies with the order of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales.

In the statement, Apple has acknowledged that its previous statement was “incorrect” and “did not comply with the court order” on the homepage with a link to the statement regarding the judgement.

On 25 October 2012, Apple Inc. published a statement on its UK website in relation to Samsung’s Galaxy tablet computers. That statement was inaccurate and did not comply with the order of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. The correct statement is at Samsung/Apple UK judgement.

The statement regarding the judgement is similar to the apology ad it ran in UK newspapers earlier in the week. It says:

Samsung / Apple UK judgment

On 9 July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computers, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s Community registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the High Court is available from

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available from There is no injunction in respect of the Community registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

The judges ordered to acknowledge that its previous statement was incorrect on the homepage after Apple posted “Samsung didn’t copy iPad” apology notice on its UK website, but instead of just acknowledging the judgement, it unleashed a scathing attack on Samsung by highlighting the comments made by the judge while comparing Apple and Samsung products and pointing out that a German court had found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design while ruling on the same patent. Apple had linked to the apology notice in the footer section of the website.

It is the first time we’ve ever heard a company getting ordered by the court to acknowledge the statement on its website. While some readers have found this excessive, we wonder if courts should do this more often to prevent companies from suing for everything.

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Hat tip 9to5Mac, CNET!

Like this post? Share it!

Categories: Apple News, Samsung

  • Andrew

    Nice, it’s about time the courts took a stance like this, forcing companies involved in IP battles to share their results with their users (or in Apple’s case fan-base). Maybe this will encourage other companies to be a little more careful about throwing the IP gauntlet around, knowing that if their claims are not solid they might be hurting public opinion of them and their products. Yay! Now everyone can get back to trying to make a better product than their competitor, like in the olden days. :)

  • Que

    News some interesting news that didn’t make this site.

    Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Release Triumphs, Smartphone Sells 3M, More Than Doubled Apple iPhone Sales

    • Alan

      What does that mean? I hope you know Apple sold more than 5 million iPhone 5 units in the opening weekend.

      And why would I want to know how many Galaxy Notes Samsung sold on an iPhone site?

      • Que

        Hmmm. 3 million sold and two of the major carriers haven’t released it yet. Hmmm.

        • AT&T Rapes Me

          And ur note 2 is gay

    • AT&T Rapes Me

      They sold 3mil in 37 days apples sold 5 mil in a weekend.

  • Pete

    If a ruling in the UK is EU wide, why isn’t the ruling in Germany?